Blog Penetration Testing vs. Vulnerability Scanning
Penetration Testing vs. Vulnerability Scanning
Cybercrime can cause devastating damage to the reputation, operations, and finances of any organization, regardless of its size or industry. Given such risk, it is crucial for organizations to implement a comprehensive security strategy that adopts a proactive approach to the detection and prevention of malicious activities.
Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing are the two main methods organizations use to proactively address security weaknesses. While they sound similar, these two methods have different goals and advantages. In this article, we will explain the differences between them and why both are necessary for a robust security posture.
What is Penetration Testing?
Penetration testing is a preemptive security measure that mimics actual cyberattacks to detect system or network vulnerabilities. It helps validate the effectiveness of an organization’s security measures strategies and assess the potential consequences of a security breach.
The process of penetration testing typically unfolds in five stages:
- Reconnaissance — In this phase, the penetration tester collects relevant information about the target, such as its environment, operating system, domain name, and IP address.
- Scanning — At this stage, the penetration tester leverages specific tools to probe the target for open ports, susceptibilities, misconfigurations, and other weaknesses that can be exploited.
- Exploitation — Here, the penetration tester leverages the vulnerabilities identified in the scanning phase to infiltrate the target system or disrupt its operations.
- Access Maintenance — In this step, the penetration tester aims to establish a consistent connection to the target or set up a backdoor for subsequent access.
- Reporting — Finally, the penetration tester provides a detailed report of the observations, analysis, and proposed corrective actions to the client or stakeholders.
What is Vulnerability Scanning?
Vulnerability scanning is an automated process that identifies and reports potential system weaknesses. A vulnerability is a defect or flaw that could be manipulated by a malicious actor to breach the system’s security or functionality.
The function of vulnerability scanning is to detect and rank the issues (like outdated software, improperly configured settings, or open ports) that pose severe risks to the system and its users. It can be executed on different elements of the system, such as the network, host, endpoints, applications, or database.
Vulnerability scanning comes in two forms:
- Active scanning: involves sending data packets to the target system and analyzing the responses.
- Passive scanning: involves observing network traffic and identifying irregularities or signs of vulnerability.
Similar to penetration testing, vulnerability scanning can help drive risk mitigation, security improvements, and regulatory compliance.
Pen Testing and Vulnerability Scanning: What’s the Difference
Penetration testing and vulnerability scanning are two distinct security assessment techniques with different objectives, scopes, and procedures.
While penetration testing’s goal is to mimic actual attacks and spot the most severe vulnerabilities that could jeopardize an organization’s security, vulnerability scanning is a more regular, automated process that searches for recognized vulnerabilities and generates a list of potential risks.
Here’s a comparison of the two:
- Scope: Penetration testing scrutinizes a broader array of vulnerabilities, including logical, design, and configuration flaws. In contrast, vulnerability scanning primarily targets known vulnerabilities detectable by software tools.
- Method: In penetration testing, human cybersecurity professionals actively look to exploit vulnerabilities to ascertain their impact and severity. In contrast, vulnerability scanning is largely automated and reports vulnerabilities without trying to exploit them.
- False Positives: The vulnerability scanning process is more susceptible to false positives, which are reported “vulnerabilities” that aren’t actually present or exploitable. In contrast, penetration testing more accurately minimizes false positives by verifying if the identified vulnerabilities are indeed exploitable.
How to Choose Between Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Scanning
Penetration testing and vulnerability scanning are two distinct techniques for assessing an organization’s security stance. Choosing between these methods depends on the company’s specific needs and circumstances, taking into consideration key factors such as scope, available resources, and the relative value of the target system to the business or operation.
Factors to consider:
- Scope: Penetration testing offers a comprehensive assessment, focusing on individual assets or testing the company’s cyber resilience in various situations. On the other hand, vulnerability scanning provides a wide-ranging survey of the information system, covering all assets within the company’s network.
- Target Value: Penetration testing is the preferred method for evaluating the security of assets with high importance or risk, such as confidential data, crucial infrastructure, or mission-critical applications. Vulnerability scanning is more fitting for assets of lower value or risk, such as general-purpose servers, workstations, or endpoint devices.
- Resources: Penetration testing requires more resources in terms of time, expertise, and budget due to its reliance on manual testing, evaluation, and report generation by certified professionals. Conversely, vulnerability scanning is a less resource-intensive approach because it primarily utilizes automated tools for scanning, analysis, and reporting.
Recognizing the variances between penetration testing and vulnerability scanning is critical for organizations when deciding the most suitable security method for their unique needs.
Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing are two different but complementary methods of testing the security of an organization’s information systems. Both methods are essential for a comprehensive security strategy because they can uncover different types of risks and provide different levels of insight.
Organizations should adopt both approaches to gain a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of their security posture and to address vulnerabilities before threat actors can exploit them.
Don’t waste time choosing one over the other. It’s infinitely better to spend time planning how to get the most from both methods in terms of cost efficiency, timeline, and security improvements.
Building Trust and Confidence with TrustNet.
TrustNet has performed hundreds of Assessments and has tremendous experience successfully guiding businesses through the process.